Saturday, December 12, 2009

No Country For Old Men

Origin: U.S. (Paramount Vantage, Mirimax Films, Scott Rudin Productions, Mike Zoss Productions) 2007
Length: 122 minutes
Format: Color
Director:
Ethan Coen, Joel Coen
Producer: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen, Scott Rudin
Screenplay: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen
Photography: Roger Deakins
Music: Carter Burwell
Cast: Tommy Lee Jones, Josh Brolin, Javier Bardem, Kelly MacDonald, Woody Harrelson.
Oscars: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen, Scott Rudin(best picture), Ethan Coen, Joel Coen(best director), Javier Bardem(best supporting actor), Ethan Coen, Joel Coen(best adapted screenplay)
Oscar Nominations: Ethan and Joel Coen as "Roderick Jaynes"(best film editing), Roger Deakins(best cinematography), Skip Lievsay, Craig Berkey, Greg Orloff, Peter F. Kurland(best sound mixing), Skip Lievsay(best sound editing).
BAFTA: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen(best director), Javier Bardem(best supporting actor), Roger Deakins(best cinematography)
Links: No Country For Old Men Trailer, No Country For Old Men Wiki, No Country For Old Men Novel Wiki, BAFTA Wiki

Cormac McCarthy's novel No Country For Old Men begins with a reminiscence about the hazard of confronting incomprehensible evil. So, too, begins Joel and Ethan Coen's movie adaptation of the book, which is a western set in Southwestern Texas in 1980.

Opening to careful shots of daybreak, orchestrated to magnificent effect by cinematographer Roger Deakins, a voice-over by Tommy Lee Jones sets the scene: "The crime you see now, it's hard to even take its measure. It's not that I'm afraid of it. I always knew you had to be willing to die to even do this job. Not to be glorious. But I don't want to push my chips forward and go out and meet something I don't understand".

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Easy Rider(John)

This movie is definitely of its time. Watching this movie today, you really have to get into the mindset of the culture of the "hippie" in order to enjoy this film. But, I believe I succeeded in doing just that, and I think this movie has a lot of positives.

First and foremost, the acting in this film is top notch. We are treated to the acting chops of three powerhouse actors: Peter Fonda, Dennis Hopper and Jack Nicholson. Peter Fonda plays the silent, brooding character. Dennis Hopper is the drug addicted wise cracker. And Jack Nicholson plays the alcoholic lawyer who tags along for part of the movie. This was literally Nicholson's first role and he did not disappoint. Honestly, I was not enjoying the movie until he shows up.

The story is just so-so. Two hippies trying to get to Mardi-Gras. That's the basic premise. Where the movie gets interesting are the events that happen during their travels and the people they meet. I will remember portions of this movie probably for the rest of my life. The reason for this film was to make people aware of some of the hate-crimes that took place against people that wanted total freedom. Jack Nicholson put it perfectly in the film: "Those people like to think about freedom. But, you guys really have it. And that's what scares them".

The music was awesome. Being made in the 70s, this film has a lot of classic rock songs that get you into the spirit of the cross country, freedom fighting hippie. I don't think there was any other music other than the rock songs during the biking scenes. But, there really was no need for anything else.

I would have to say this movie is a must watch. I would advise everyone to try and think about being a hippie while watching this movie. Otherwise, it may actually be a disappointing movie. The plot is minimal, there are no huge special effects and other than the rock music insertions, there is no score. But I think everyone who watches will remember two specific scenes that will solidify the reason for the entire film.

I have to give the film a 8 out of 10. Probably if it wasn't so influential, the score would be lower.

- John Murphy

Easy Rider (Matt)

This movie I went into more or less blind. I knew it was about a trip on motorcycles, and I knew it had Dennis Hopper, Peter Fonda, and Jack Nicholson in it. That's about it. I was surprised by what I found in the film, both in positive and negative ways. There were aspects of the film that I really liked, and likewise, aspects that I did not.

Let's start with what I didn't like. First and probably the largest issue that I have with this movie is the plot, or lack thereof. I have thought about this film for a while now, and I'm still not completely sure what the story was. Two nomad friends make a cocaine deal, get a lot of cash, then go on a trip to New Orleans. That is the entire plot. They have various encounters with different groups of people along the way, but really, that's it. This annoyed me as I wanted more of an explanation as to why the characters are doing what they are doing. There are also some scenes that seem to be missing that I would consider important. A prime example of this is the two men obtaining their motorcycles. In the opening scene they are riding what appear to be cheap, off-road, motocross type motorcycles. Soon after they are riding the choppers that are considered iconic to the film. We never see them buy the bikes, I never even noticed them mentioning buying the bikes. I read that almost an hour and a half was cut from the film, but I feel that maybe some of the cut scenes should have remained.

Another part of the movie that bothered me is the extremes of the characters moods. All of the characters seem to be in the same mood for the entire movie. Peter Fonda is always sort of staring into space and thinking. Dennis Hopper is always loud and animated. Jack Nicholson is always being friendly and naive. Even when faced with serious events such as the death of their friends they retain these moods. They change once or twice, but usually they just all stay the same. I had a hard time connecting to the characters because of this.

Lastly, the directing of the move was a little... strange. There were several transitions between scenes that involved flashing back and forth between the current scene and the next one. These flashes back and forth were disorienting, and I would often be confused about what was going on for a little bit until I was able to get my bearings. Also along these same lines there were several other scene transitions that were abrupt and blunt and in some cases downright startling. We might be taken from a quiet dark scene instantly to a bright loud scene with no warning. I suppose I could understand these transitions if they were trying to simulate the experience of being drugged like the main characters were, but I just found it off-putting.

Alright, so like I mentioned earlier, I like the movie too. So now here are some things I liked about it.

I first want to mention here the music. It was great. Apparently when this film was made it was unusual to use songs that are already created/popular for the soundtrack. At the time it was a fairly groundbreaking move and I have to say for this movie it was brilliant. My favorite parts of the movie usually contained a great song that I recognized from that time period.

Next up would be the way they portrayed the spirit of freedom that the characters were representing. The scenes featuring the characters riding through beautiful landscapes on their motorcycles were wonderful. I enjoyed seeing the characters interact at night when they were usually camping out. I've been on several camping trips and the feeling of the nights when the work is done and the fires are lit was spot on. I felt like I was right there, sitting on the ground and talking with these characters under the open sky.

Lastly I want to mention the ending. It's a shocker, and after some thought I've decided that I liked it. They took on the issue of hate crime head on, and it was brutal and real. Just like in real life. It was pointless, as in reality hate crime often is, and I thought it fit fairly well. I will mention this however, if this movie had a more involved plot and I were better connected to the characters I might have felt differently. As it was I had a lesser attachment to these guys, and so the ending didn't effect me too much other than to cause a "man, that sucks" reaction. Regardless of the reasons though, I felt the ending was bold and a good move.

So there you go, I both like and didn't like this movie. That's a pretty horrible stance for a review I realize, but it is what it is. I give this movie 6 golden football helmets out of 10.

~Matt